Liz M
Liz M's projects
Recent Activity
Supported a comment by Jeff Hecht on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 5 months ago
Supported a comment by Jeff Hecht on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 5 months ago
Jeff Hecht
Agreed Riverside is not much of a transit hub now, but it could become one if it is not overbuilt, and if the MBTA, Newton, and nearby towns are willing to invest in desperately needed additional transit. Without more transit, the Riverside area will choke on traffic.
Agreed Riverside is not much of a transit hub now, but it could become one if it is not overbuilt, and if the MBTA, Newton, and nearby towns are willing to invest in desperately needed additional transit. Without more transit, the Riverside area will choke on traffic.
Supported a comment by David DD on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 5 months ago
David DD
Infrastructure first! Embellishments later!
Infrastructure first! Embellishments later!
Supported a comment by Ken Stern on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 5 months ago
Ken Stern
Yes, Waltham, Wellesley, Needham & Weston do all have large commercial developments along the highway. In all cases, the residential sections of the town ends where the commercial section begins, and there is no further residential section on the other side. Needham and Wellesley have parts of their town on the opposite side of the highway than where most of their town is located, but that portion is entirely commercial.
In Newton, Lower Falls was already somewhat cut off from the rest of Newton by the highway. Whats left of the connection will be virtually severed by putting an enormous commercial development
Yes, Waltham, Wellesley, Needham & Weston do all have large commercial developments along the highway. In all cases, the residential sections of the town ends where the commercial section begins, and there is no further residential section on the other side. Needham and Wellesley have parts of their town on the opposite side of the highway than where most of their town is located, but that portion is entirely commercial.
In Newton, Lower Falls was already somewhat cut off from the rest of Newton by the highway. Whats left of the connection will be virtually severed by putting an enormous commercial development
Supported a comment by Alison Bassett on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 5 months ago
Alison Bassett
Please Newton, state, & MBTA officials do this the right way & the right size. I agree with the comment above.
Please Newton, state, & MBTA officials do this the right way & the right size. I agree with the comment above.
Supported a comment by Alexander Golob on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 5 months ago
Alexander Golob
Totally agree! There is such an easy transit connection there that would make such a big difference in public transit accessibility and use.
Totally agree! There is such an easy transit connection there that would make such a big difference in public transit accessibility and use.
Supported a comment by Jeff Hecht on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 5 months ago
Jeff Hecht
The Riverside site needs room to expand as a regional transit center for all of Metro West, a hub for Newton, Waltham, Weston, Wellesley and surrounding cities with transit that goes north-south as well as east-west. Fully developing the site would limit the prospects for these much-needed services.
The Riverside site needs room to expand as a regional transit center for all of Metro West, a hub for Newton, Waltham, Weston, Wellesley and surrounding cities with transit that goes north-south as well as east-west. Fully developing the site would limit the prospects for these much-needed services.
Supported a comment by Ian Lamont on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 5 months ago
Ian Lamont
Exactly.
There's already an agreement, finalized in 2013, that determined that the right size for Riverside was 580,000 square feet, including nearly 300 hundred new housing units. EVERYONE AGREED TO THIS.
It’s not local residents who want to go through this visioning process all over again. It’s being driven by developer Robert Korff and his business partner BH Normandy (who negotiated the 2013 agreement). Instead of the agreed-upon 580,000 square feet, they are demanding 1.5 million square feet, including two 200+ foot tall towers, and many hundreds of additional units of luxury housing. They stand to add hundreds of millions of dollars in additional value to their project, while residents of Auburndale, Newton Lower Falls, and other parts of Newton are saddled with massive costs related to traffic, schools, infrastructure, planning, and more.
Exactly.
There's already an agreement, finalized in 2013, that determined that the right size for Riverside was 580,000 square feet, including nearly 300 hundred new housing units. EVERYONE AGREED TO THIS.
It’s not local residents who want to go through this visioning process all over again. It’s being driven by developer Robert Korff and his business partner BH Normandy (who negotiated the 2013 agreement). Instead of the agreed-upon 580,000 square feet, they are demanding 1.5 million square feet, including two 200+ foot tall towers, and many hundreds of additional units of luxury housing. They stand to add hundreds of millions of dollars in additional value to their project, while residents of Auburndale, Newton Lower Falls, and other parts of Newton are saddled with massive costs related to traffic, schools, infrastructure, planning, and more.
Supported a comment by Rose D on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Rose D
Exactly. Developers can attempt to put in all kinds of retail stores and apartment buildings but people aren't going to shop or live there if traffic and transport is not exceedingly convenient and cheap. People work too hard and have too little time to spend it on inefficient public transportation or crowded expensive parking lots when there are more affordable hassle-free options available.
Exactly. Developers can attempt to put in all kinds of retail stores and apartment buildings but people aren't going to shop or live there if traffic and transport is not exceedingly convenient and cheap. People work too hard and have too little time to spend it on inefficient public transportation or crowded expensive parking lots when there are more affordable hassle-free options available.
Supported a comment by Herbie Robinson on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Herbie Robinson
How does the developer plan on doing this without losing their shirt because all of the existing transportation to/from the site is already overloaded? Rt. 128 is essentially a parking lot for 4-6 hours a day and the Green Line is nearly that saturated. People need to understand that growth isn't possible unless that state gets serious about dealing with regional transportation. Developers see the wealthy community and get $$ in their eyes, but then they don't get enough business to survive. Like that new mall they put into Chestnut Hill 10 years ago. Really slick place, but it was easier to get to Natick and that's where everyone went.
How does the developer plan on doing this without losing their shirt because all of the existing transportation to/from the site is already overloaded? Rt. 128 is essentially a parking lot for 4-6 hours a day and the Green Line is nearly that saturated. People need to understand that growth isn't possible unless that state gets serious about dealing with regional transportation. Developers see the wealthy community and get $$ in their eyes, but then they don't get enough business to survive. Like that new mall they put into Chestnut Hill 10 years ago. Really slick place, but it was easier to get to Natick and that's where everyone went.
Supported a comment by Rose D on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Rose D
and on the other side through to the Cove.
and on the other side through to the Cove.
Supported a comment by Kay Khan on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Kay Khan
Completion of off street bike and pedestrian access to Riverside Station from Concord Street In Newton Lower Falls along the old rail trail that begins on Washington Street in Wellesley Lower Falls.
Completion of off street bike and pedestrian access to Riverside Station from Concord Street In Newton Lower Falls along the old rail trail that begins on Washington Street in Wellesley Lower Falls.
Supported a comment by Debra Ruder on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Debra Ruder
I appreciate all the hard work that went into the March 28 presentation, but I was shocked by the market context section, which sounded like an ad for Mark Development's proposal. This is supposed to be an independent visioning process. Also ... Newton Lower Falls as a gateway to the city?!? Please. An appropriately sized/scaled mixed-use development that benefits the city without causing horrible traffic is fine. But just because Riverside sits near Route 128 does not = "gateway."
I appreciate all the hard work that went into the March 28 presentation, but I was shocked by the market context section, which sounded like an ad for Mark Development's proposal. This is supposed to be an independent visioning process. Also ... Newton Lower Falls as a gateway to the city?!? Please. An appropriately sized/scaled mixed-use development that benefits the city without causing horrible traffic is fine. But just because Riverside sits near Route 128 does not = "gateway."
Commented on Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
The Woodland T stop development added needed housing and has had a minimal impact on the surrounding area. It’s size and scale fits with the surrounding neighborhood.
Supported a comment by Tim M. on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Tim M.
The presentation at city hall touted 'fixing' the Grove Street traffic problems as a major benefit. When I get off northbound 95 I simply take the off ramp, yield onto Grove and continue. The proposal will use a much longer off-ramp and add 3 traffic lights. How is this an improvement for Auburndale residents?
The presentation at city hall touted 'fixing' the Grove Street traffic problems as a major benefit. When I get off northbound 95 I simply take the off ramp, yield onto Grove and continue. The proposal will use a much longer off-ramp and add 3 traffic lights. How is this an improvement for Auburndale residents?
Supported a comment by Robert Barnacle on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Robert Barnacle
More middle income housing options. Apartments that can help people who actually need to use the T. People who work in Boston, but cannot afford to live there (everyone). These new apartments that are $3000+ are not helping anyone.
More middle income housing options. Apartments that can help people who actually need to use the T. People who work in Boston, but cannot afford to live there (everyone). These new apartments that are $3000+ are not helping anyone.
Supported a comment by Nathaniel Lichtin on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Nathaniel Lichtin
This site should have a development that is keeping in scale with the existing city of newton and surrounding area and that does not have a harmful impact on the traffic or transportation in the city more generally. If housing is developed it must include real affordable housing not legally affordable housing that is not actually affordable.
This site should have a development that is keeping in scale with the existing city of newton and surrounding area and that does not have a harmful impact on the traffic or transportation in the city more generally. If housing is developed it must include real affordable housing not legally affordable housing that is not actually affordable.
Supported a comment by Christina H on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Christina H
A connection to the commuter rail and Kendall Square Appropriate density and size Locally-owned shops Green Spaces and Bike paths Connection to River Homes for teachers and other city workers Improved traffic flow throughout neighborhood
A connection to the commuter rail and Kendall Square Appropriate density and size Locally-owned shops Green Spaces and Bike paths Connection to River Homes for teachers and other city workers Improved traffic flow throughout neighborhood
Supported a comment by Tim M. on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Tim M.
I'd like to see 100% affordable housing. There's a desperate need for it in Newton for it and it's always listed as a top reason for building. Why limit it to 10 or 15 percent? I believe that there are developers who would would be happy to do it. Boston recently completed 'The Beverly' by North Station; New York City has done many of their own. It could provide a real benefit to and reflect the progressive beliefs of our community.
I'd like to see 100% affordable housing. There's a desperate need for it in Newton for it and it's always listed as a top reason for building. Why limit it to 10 or 15 percent? I believe that there are developers who would would be happy to do it. Boston recently completed 'The Beverly' by North Station; New York City has done many of their own. It could provide a real benefit to and reflect the progressive beliefs of our community.
Supported a comment by Nathaniel Lichtin on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Nathaniel Lichtin
Why are we waiting for a project to be proposed to figure out how much traffic the area can handle and the capacity of other transportation infrastructure. Knowing what amount of traffic the area can handle is critical to figuring out what should be built there. My vision for the site will depend on how the site will impact the traffic and transportation in the area. Without this information it is impossible to have an accurate vision of what is desired or acceptable for the site.
Why are we waiting for a project to be proposed to figure out how much traffic the area can handle and the capacity of other transportation infrastructure. Knowing what amount of traffic the area can handle is critical to figuring out what should be built there. My vision for the site will depend on how the site will impact the traffic and transportation in the area. Without this information it is impossible to have an accurate vision of what is desired or acceptable for the site.
Supported a comment by Nathaniel Lichtin on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Nathaniel Lichtin
Will this visioning process include any analysis of impacts on traffic and transportation based on what the proposed vision is?
Will this visioning process include any analysis of impacts on traffic and transportation based on what the proposed vision is?
Supported a comment by Sheila Doyle on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 6 months ago
Sheila Doyle
I would like to see a reasonably-sized development that includes a small grocery store and/or drug store, small coffee shop, publicly-accessible bathrooms, plenty of green space without sacrificing trees, affordable housing, parking, more than one entrance, and connection/improvement of the walkway/path behind Riverside to connect with other walking paths and/or bikeways. I think Newton needs more affordable housing options, and I also think some thought should be put into how many apartments we can reasonably add without overwhelming the school, area, and public services. I agree with Liz's comment that the development should be set back from Grove St, because a wall of buildings right on that hilly street would be terrible. Traffic is already a problem in Lower Falls, especially when folks are trying to find parking during Red Sox games or days with large marches downtown, so careful planning should be put into making sure there is plenty of parking and keeping in mind how traffic tends to back up on Grove St especially when the parking lot gets full at Riverside. It would be phenomenal to have a Commuter Rail option at Riverside, and a direct route in to Cambridge without having to switch trolleys/buses multiple times. I would like to see the new plan be pedestrian-friendly; I like the path between Riverside and Norumbega Ct, it's nice to walk on and there is nice landscaping and lighting there and it feels safe from nearby cars.
I would like to see a reasonably-sized development that includes a small grocery store and/or drug store, small coffee shop, publicly-accessible bathrooms, plenty of green space without sacrificing trees, affordable housing, parking, more than one entrance, and connection/improvement of the walkway/path behind Riverside to connect with other walking paths and/or bikeways. I think Newton needs more affordable housing options, and I also think some thought should be put into how many apartments we can reasonably add without overwhelming the school, area, and public services. I agree with Liz's comment that the development should be set back from Grove St, because a wall of buildings right on that hilly street would be terrible. Traffic is already a problem in Lower Falls, especially when folks are trying to find parking during Red Sox games or days with large marches downtown, so careful planning should be put into making sure there is plenty of parking and keeping in mind how traffic tends to back up on Grove St especially when the parking lot gets full at Riverside. It would be phenomenal to have a Commuter Rail option at Riverside, and a direct route in to Cambridge without having to switch trolleys/buses multiple times. I would like to see the new plan be pedestrian-friendly; I like the path between Riverside and Norumbega Ct, it's nice to walk on and there is nice landscaping and lighting there and it feels safe from nearby cars.
Supported a comment by Elaine Arruda on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Elaine Arruda
Agree 100%
Agree 100%
Commented on Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Connection to Kendall Sq. will make Riverside more vibrant (and solve traffic congestion issues too). Globe article on 2/20/19 envisions an expanded Kendall Square "in different parts of the city and suburbs — ideally connected by a transit system that makes it easy for people and their ideas to mingle" https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2019/02/19/the-next-kendall-square/iCZz1e7eIECMPufD3UJtiO/story.html?p1=Article_Trending_Most_Viewed
Supported a comment by Mike Nogrady on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Mike Nogrady
Restore the Riverside stop on the Worcester/Natick commuter rail line
Restore the Riverside stop on the Worcester/Natick commuter rail line
Supported a comment by john stewart on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
john stewart
1) have very little impact on quality of life in Lower Falls and Auburndale 2) thoroughly explore direct access to route 128, in both directions, completely eliminating Grove St. as an essential route to or from the site. 3) create a complex of offices and apartments as beautiful and hidden as Riverside Park next door.
1) have very little impact on quality of life in Lower Falls and Auburndale 2) thoroughly explore direct access to route 128, in both directions, completely eliminating Grove St. as an essential route to or from the site. 3) create a complex of offices and apartments as beautiful and hidden as Riverside Park next door.
Supported a comment by john stewart on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
john stewart
traffic, traffic, traffic
traffic, traffic, traffic
Supported a comment by Debra Ruder on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Debra Ruder
A thoughtfully designed, inviting mixed-use development that fits the scale of the Lower Falls and Auburndale neighborhoods. Replace the asphalt desert with attractive and affordable housing for singles, families and seniors; a few restaurants; parks and well-lit paths; ample parking for commuters; and upgraded mass transit options. Please don’t overshadow (literally) our charming village of Lower Falls with towers or choke Grove Street and other area roads with overwhelming traffic. Please.
A thoughtfully designed, inviting mixed-use development that fits the scale of the Lower Falls and Auburndale neighborhoods. Replace the asphalt desert with attractive and affordable housing for singles, families and seniors; a few restaurants; parks and well-lit paths; ample parking for commuters; and upgraded mass transit options. Please don’t overshadow (literally) our charming village of Lower Falls with towers or choke Grove Street and other area roads with overwhelming traffic. Please.
Supported a comment by Debra Ruder on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Debra Ruder
The development should be only as large/dense/tall as the site and city's schools, roads, infrastructure, environment, social and emergency services, and surrounding villages can bear. In 2013, when it approved the "Station at Riverside" plan after years of public meetings and negotiations, the City of Newton deemed that to be roughly 580,000 square feet. There is so much at stake. Let's take the time to get it right!
The development should be only as large/dense/tall as the site and city's schools, roads, infrastructure, environment, social and emergency services, and surrounding villages can bear. In 2013, when it approved the "Station at Riverside" plan after years of public meetings and negotiations, the City of Newton deemed that to be roughly 580,000 square feet. There is so much at stake. Let's take the time to get it right!
Supported a comment by Chris Sci on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Chris Sci
Nothing should be done on that site until the following occur: 1. Pave Grove Street!!!! It is worse than a third world country. That needs to happen now with or without new construction. 2. Ultimately Grove Street needs to be widened. 3. The exit off of 128 coming from Needham is one of the most dangerous in Massachusetts. Not acceptable now. Nor with increased volume if development occurs. 4. The exit off 128 to the Mass Pike coming from Needham also needs to be updated. Why it was designed with one lane only to exit off 128 I'll never understand.
Nothing should be done on that site until the following occur: 1. Pave Grove Street!!!! It is worse than a third world country. That needs to happen now with or without new construction. 2. Ultimately Grove Street needs to be widened. 3. The exit off of 128 coming from Needham is one of the most dangerous in Massachusetts. Not acceptable now. Nor with increased volume if development occurs. 4. The exit off 128 to the Mass Pike coming from Needham also needs to be updated. Why it was designed with one lane only to exit off 128 I'll never understand.
Supported a comment by Sarah Birmingham White on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Sarah Birmingham White
That the scale of the project will be respectful of the neighborhood. As well as the materials used.
That the scale of the project will be respectful of the neighborhood. As well as the materials used.
Supported a comment by Erin Giesser on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Erin Giesser
Traffic will back up through here and cars will stream through our small neighborhood and narrow streets to avoid lights at Grove. What will be done to prevent this?
Traffic will back up through here and cars will stream through our small neighborhood and narrow streets to avoid lights at Grove. What will be done to prevent this?
Supported a comment by john stewart on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
john stewart
what happens if the overwhelming consensus is that there is almost nothing of conceivable benefit to Lower Falls and Auburndale that might come from this development, and that there is no chance whatsoever of "integrating" the development with the community life of either neighborhood?
what happens if the overwhelming consensus is that there is almost nothing of conceivable benefit to Lower Falls and Auburndale that might come from this development, and that there is no chance whatsoever of "integrating" the development with the community life of either neighborhood?
Supported a comment by Sarah Birmingham White on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Sarah Birmingham White
I would like to see the connection between the villages of Newton Lower Falls and Auburndale strengthened instead of severed. I think this is an opportunity for the two communities to have the gape (128) bridged is a way that has not yet been presented.
I would like to see the connection between the villages of Newton Lower Falls and Auburndale strengthened instead of severed. I think this is an opportunity for the two communities to have the gape (128) bridged is a way that has not yet been presented.
Supported a comment by Randall Block on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Randall Block
Riverside will be an auto-oriented development. The only reason it makes economic sense is proximity to I-95 and the Mass Pike. Proximity to an unreliable trolley line is a minor positive factor.
Riverside will be an auto-oriented development. The only reason it makes economic sense is proximity to I-95 and the Mass Pike. Proximity to an unreliable trolley line is a minor positive factor.
Supported a comment by Michael Musen on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Michael Musen
My aspiration is that the development enhances existing neighborhoods and does not destroy them with traffic and congestion.
My aspiration is that the development enhances existing neighborhoods and does not destroy them with traffic and congestion.
Supported a comment by Randall Block on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Randall Block
Direct connection from I-95/128 should be in BOTH directions, not just northbound as Mark Development proposes Even then, there will be plenty of additional traffic heading to Riverside on Grove Street from the rest of Newton and adjacent towns.
Direct connection from I-95/128 should be in BOTH directions, not just northbound as Mark Development proposes Even then, there will be plenty of additional traffic heading to Riverside on Grove Street from the rest of Newton and adjacent towns.
Supported a comment by Scott Sanders on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Scott Sanders
If traffic is forecast to increase dramatically, create a direct connection to Route 95/128 to minimize traffic impact on Grove St. This would also be a benefit to commuters who are parking at Riverside. For example, Legacy Place in Dedham has made the traffic at Route 1 very heavy during peak shopping periods. It can take 20-30 minutes to exit the complex, even outside the holiday season. Please develop traffic planning to alleviate this. Having existing mass transit onsite will certainly help!
If traffic is forecast to increase dramatically, create a direct connection to Route 95/128 to minimize traffic impact on Grove St. This would also be a benefit to commuters who are parking at Riverside. For example, Legacy Place in Dedham has made the traffic at Route 1 very heavy during peak shopping periods. It can take 20-30 minutes to exit the complex, even outside the holiday season. Please develop traffic planning to alleviate this. Having existing mass transit onsite will certainly help!
Supported a comment by Tim M. on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Tim M.
I'd like the impact of this project to be considered within the context of the other big projects - planned, underway or completed - in the city. Concerns about increased traffic are a common theme. Beyond inconvenience, the traffic's impact on our already crumbling streets shouldn't be ignored. Nearness to 'Public transportation' is listed as a benefit to these projects, but the MBTA's struggle with equipment and capacity is always overlooked. Personally, I would be okay - not happy - if the original Riverside agreement was implemented. I don't understand how it was simply discarded and believe that an explanation is required.
I'd like the impact of this project to be considered within the context of the other big projects - planned, underway or completed - in the city. Concerns about increased traffic are a common theme. Beyond inconvenience, the traffic's impact on our already crumbling streets shouldn't be ignored. Nearness to 'Public transportation' is listed as a benefit to these projects, but the MBTA's struggle with equipment and capacity is always overlooked. Personally, I would be okay - not happy - if the original Riverside agreement was implemented. I don't understand how it was simply discarded and believe that an explanation is required.
Supported a comment by David D on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
David D
I would like to see a smaller useful development. Publicly accessible bathrooms, a place to eat at reasonable rates and interesting shops. I would also like to see this development turned into a true transportation hub by connecting the end of the D line to the Framingham commuter rail line in both directions.
I would like to see a smaller useful development. Publicly accessible bathrooms, a place to eat at reasonable rates and interesting shops. I would also like to see this development turned into a true transportation hub by connecting the end of the D line to the Framingham commuter rail line in both directions.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
I would like to see the proposed Riverside project at least halved in size and scope. In other words what was approved many years ago. That was quite big enough.
I would like to see the proposed Riverside project at least halved in size and scope. In other words what was approved many years ago. That was quite big enough.
Supported a comment by Randall Block on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Randall Block
I suggest direct access to and from I-95/128 south should be a condition of the development.
I suggest direct access to and from I-95/128 south should be a condition of the development.
Supported a comment by Randall Block on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Randall Block
It would be nice if there was frequent bus service to metrowest towns and commercial centers. But that will only work if the Green Line becomes more reliable and a commuter rail (Indigo Line) connects Riverside to Cambridge. So many people would park their cars at Riverside if that option existed.
It would be nice if there was frequent bus service to metrowest towns and commercial centers. But that will only work if the Green Line becomes more reliable and a commuter rail (Indigo Line) connects Riverside to Cambridge. So many people would park their cars at Riverside if that option existed.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
A model transit-oriented mixed use development that the city can be proud of.
A model transit-oriented mixed use development that the city can be proud of.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
Transportation hub, mixed income housing at a scale that fits with the surrounding neighborhoods, open space for recreation, especially along the river.
Transportation hub, mixed income housing at a scale that fits with the surrounding neighborhoods, open space for recreation, especially along the river.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
Moderate mixed use in keeping with the neighboring villages--blogs should not be too dense or too tall. Lots of green space. Community center and recreation space. Small local businesses and sufficient parking for commuters near the station itself.
Moderate mixed use in keeping with the neighboring villages--blogs should not be too dense or too tall. Lots of green space. Community center and recreation space. Small local businesses and sufficient parking for commuters near the station itself.
Supported a comment by Christine Lacey on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Christine Lacey
I would like to see river access for the residents of the new apartments, and for residents of the existing neighborhood. Also, link it up to other river paths. People who live at the Comm Ave apartments, people who live on Charles Street, people who use the canoe and kayak rental, etc., should NOT have to walk all the way around. They should be able to walk along the river to get to Riverside station. I doubt people even know they can take the green line to Riverside and walk over to the canoe and kayak rentals. Many cities and towns, Waltham included, have made sure to utilize the space along the Charles River for recreation. Why can't we do the same?
I would like to see river access for the residents of the new apartments, and for residents of the existing neighborhood. Also, link it up to other river paths. People who live at the Comm Ave apartments, people who live on Charles Street, people who use the canoe and kayak rental, etc., should NOT have to walk all the way around. They should be able to walk along the river to get to Riverside station. I doubt people even know they can take the green line to Riverside and walk over to the canoe and kayak rentals. Many cities and towns, Waltham included, have made sure to utilize the space along the Charles River for recreation. Why can't we do the same?
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
To earn support from community I think you are going to need to convince the neighbors that this project will improve the neighborhood. This means that the site will benefit not just people on the site but also the neighborhood as a whole.
To earn support from community I think you are going to need to convince the neighbors that this project will improve the neighborhood. This means that the site will benefit not just people on the site but also the neighborhood as a whole.
Commented on Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Create a connection to the Auburndale commuter rail that could bring commuters to Kendall Sq. (the Indigo line).
Commented on Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Make sure there isn’t a wall of buildings along Grove St. Any development should be set back from the road and stepped back too.
Commented on Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Rehab the 2 bridges bike path/walkway to allow access into the site
Commented on Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Find a way to get direct access to 128 South
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
We need a Low impact community plan. No one in the community wants an oversized develop that just adds to the developers bottom line.
We need a Low impact community plan. No one in the community wants an oversized develop that just adds to the developers bottom line.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
My aspiration for the riverside site is that my special lower falls neighborhood is not destroyed by traffic. The exit off 95 in either direction should not turn into the same situation as exit 17 off the Pike.
My aspiration for the riverside site is that my special lower falls neighborhood is not destroyed by traffic. The exit off 95 in either direction should not turn into the same situation as exit 17 off the Pike.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
A greatly improved experience for those who take trains and buses out of the site.
A greatly improved experience for those who take trains and buses out of the site.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
I would very much like to see expanded public transportation options, and expanded frequency of transportation. I am also interested in more open space for public use. Some housing would be great, but it should be of similar density to the surrounding villages.
I would very much like to see expanded public transportation options, and expanded frequency of transportation. I am also interested in more open space for public use. Some housing would be great, but it should be of similar density to the surrounding villages.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
New recreational connections ( to path on charles river to golf course to canoe rental etc) and new commuter connections (short walk to commuter rail stop in back)
New recreational connections ( to path on charles river to golf course to canoe rental etc) and new commuter connections (short walk to commuter rail stop in back)
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
A coffee shop and public restrooms!
A coffee shop and public restrooms!
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
I am against any large development that changes the character or out Auburndale neighborhood. We don't need more traffic or congestion. I can imagine some kind of rehabilitation of the existing T station and surrounds but not one that brings in more foot and car traffic. Park land and green space would be ideal
I am against any large development that changes the character or out Auburndale neighborhood. We don't need more traffic or congestion. I can imagine some kind of rehabilitation of the existing T station and surrounds but not one that brings in more foot and car traffic. Park land and green space would be ideal
Supported a comment by Larry Rosenberg on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Larry Rosenberg
Fully vet the impact to city services. Fire Dept, Police trash collection traffic and more. We are proposing 3 huge projects all at the same time. This will be a city people who want the "charm" will NOT want to live.
Fully vet the impact to city services. Fire Dept, Police trash collection traffic and more. We are proposing 3 huge projects all at the same time. This will be a city people who want the "charm" will NOT want to live.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
My aspirations for the riverside site is that it's size and density is scaled to what matches the surrounding residential areas.
My aspirations for the riverside site is that it's size and density is scaled to what matches the surrounding residential areas.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on
Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
The Framingham Worcester commuter rail connection to riverside as a transportation hub needs to be planned out before any mixed use development proposal at riverside is approved. Anything else is shortsighted.
The Framingham Worcester commuter rail connection to riverside as a transportation hub needs to be planned out before any mixed use development proposal at riverside is approved. Anything else is shortsighted.
Followed Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Commented on Newton Riverside Visioning Process
4 years, 7 months ago
Riverside offers a once in a lifetime development opportunity. My aspiration is that the city and state governments will step up and commit to making it possible to create a development that won't overwhelm the neighborhoods around it. It could be a model for how cities can grow responsibly and thoughtfully with some public funding.
There are no simple solutions to the problems we face (housing shortage, not enough commercial development, climate change, income inequality, etc.) and one parcel of land can't solve all of them. But it can be a start if it's done right.
Doing it right will take planning and commitment of time and money. For example, for Riverside to be a good TOD, the MBTA needs improve the D line, bring back the express bus, and add the Indigo line in the future. To reduce the carbon footprint, services need to be walkable from the development. This means the City should commit to enlarging Williams to accommodate the school children that will come from the development. Finding room "in the system" isn't sufficient - it will add buses and parents in cars to the equation. These are just a couple of examples of the type of planning that needs to be done and the public funds that need to be committed.
Visioning is a good first step. I hope that the city will continue to step up and the state will contribute as well. Both need to invite input and act on what they hear.
Sitting close to the junction of route 128/95 and the Mass Turnpike, Riverside has the potential to expand into a regional transportation hub serving the Metro West area with badly needed mass transit. Surrounding it with a massive development would block the future growth of transit capacity needed to realize that potential.