Randall Block

Location

Joined

February, 2019

Recent Activity

Supported a comment by Liz M on Newton Riverside Visioning Process 4 years, 7 months ago
Liz M
Riverside offers a once in a lifetime development opportunity. My aspiration is that the city and state governments will step up and commit to making it possible to create a development that won't overwhelm the neighborhoods around it. It could be a model for how cities can grow responsibly and thoughtfully with some public funding. There are no simple solutions to the problems we face (housing shortage, not enough commercial development, climate change, income inequality, etc.) and one parcel of land can't solve all of them. But it can be a start if it's done right. Doing it right will take planning and commitment of time and money. For example, for Riverside to be a good TOD, the MBTA needs improve the D line, bring back the express bus, and add the Indigo line in the future. To reduce the carbon footprint, services need to be walkable from the development. This means the City should commit to enlarging Williams to accommodate the school children that will come from the development. Finding room "in the system" isn't sufficient - it will add buses and parents in cars to the equation. These are just a couple of examples of the type of planning that needs to be done and the public funds that need to be committed. Visioning is a good first step. I hope that the city will continue to step up and the state will contribute as well. Both need to invite input and act on what they hear.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on Newton Riverside Visioning Process 4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
We need a Low impact community plan. No one in the community wants an oversized develop that just adds to the developers bottom line.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on Newton Riverside Visioning Process 4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
I would like to see the proposed Riverside project at least halved in size and scope. In other words what was approved many years ago. That was quite big enough.
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on Newton Riverside Visioning Process 4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
I am against any large development that changes the character or out Auburndale neighborhood. We don't need more traffic or congestion. I can imagine some kind of rehabilitation of the existing T station and surrounds but not one that brings in more foot and car traffic. Park land and green space would be ideal
Supported a comment by coUrbanizer via Text on Newton Riverside Visioning Process 4 years, 7 months ago
coUrbanizer via Text
A greatly improved experience for those who take trains and buses out of the site.
Commented on Newton Riverside Visioning Process 4 years, 7 months ago
Riverside will be an auto-oriented development. The only reason it makes economic sense is proximity to I-95 and the Mass Pike. Proximity to an unreliable trolley line is a minor positive factor.