john stewart

Location

Joined

February, 2019

Recent Activity

Supported a comment by Tim M. on Newton Riverside Visioning Process 4 years, 8 months ago
Tim M.
The presentation at city hall touted 'fixing' the Grove Street traffic problems as a major benefit. When I get off northbound 95 I simply take the off ramp, yield onto Grove and continue. The proposal will use a much longer off-ramp and add 3 traffic lights. How is this an improvement for Auburndale residents?
Commented on Newton Riverside Visioning Process 4 years, 9 months ago
traffic, traffic, traffic
Commented on Newton Riverside Visioning Process 4 years, 9 months ago
what happens if the overwhelming consensus is that there is almost nothing of conceivable benefit to Lower Falls and Auburndale that might come from this development, and that there is no chance whatsoever of "integrating" the development with the community life of either neighborhood?
Followed Newton Riverside Visioning Process 4 years, 9 months ago
Commented on Newton Riverside Visioning Process 4 years, 9 months ago
1) have very little impact on quality of life in Lower Falls and Auburndale 2) thoroughly explore direct access to route 128, in both directions, completely eliminating Grove St. as an essential route to or from the site. 3) create a complex of offices and apartments as beautiful and hidden as Riverside Park next door.